Genesis 49-50
At the end
of his life, Jacob gathered his sons and gave his blessing, so to speak, to
them. I say, “so to speak,” because some of them don’t seem particularly
blessed. It’s kind of a blessing, kind of a reflection on his son’s character, and
partly a prediction. Of note, Reuben is excluded from the birthright because he
tried to claim it early by sleeping with Bilhah, Rachel’s servant and the
mother of two of Jacob’s sons. Simeon and Levi are also excluded because of
their violent response to the Shechemites. Eventually, Simeon’s tribal
allotment would be completely swallowed up in Judah’s and Levi would never
receive an allotment because his descendants would be dedicated to the
tabernacle. Jacob’s words would be fulfilled (49:7). Judah, the firstborn,
become the chief heir, and eventually David, Israel’s greatest king, would come
from his tribe. So, would Jesus… A number of the rest of the sons’ blessings indicate
something about the character and fate of the tribes that would come out of
them. Joseph’s fruitfulness is fulfilled in the Exodus when Ephraim and Manasseh
both receive an allotment, making Joseph into two tribes.
I think the
saddest part of the story comes after Jacob dies and the period of mourning is
over. Joseph’s brothers assume that Joseph’s forgiveness was feigned and that he
would take his vengeance for their earlier bad deeds now that dad was dead. But
Joseph reassured them that God used even their misdeeds for the good of many.
Remarkable maturity for someone from this family!
It does get
one thinking about the difficulty of receiving forgiveness. In our day, we often
hear talk about how important it is that we forgive ourselves. I’m not a fan of
that language. The phenomenon is there: we often bear the shame of our sin long
after forgiveness is given. But the problem is not that we haven’t forgiven
ourselves; the problem is that we don’t believe forgiveness was actually given.
When we’re dealing with human interactions, that’s understandable: even the
most well-intentioned human who grants forgiveness will from time to time still
bring the incident up. They might not hold ill will anymore, but there is the reminder
of our failures nonetheless. That’s why it’s important when we are giving
forgiveness to one another that we understand that forgiveness contains a
promise, “I will not use this incident against you anymore.” However, when we’re
dealing with divine forgiveness, we have to take the Lord at His word. Psalm 32:12,
for instance: “as far as the east is from the west, so far has he removed our
transgressions from us.” Or Isaiah 43:25, “I, even I, am he who blots out your
transgressions, for my own sake, and remembers your sins no more.” The issue
here is not one of self-forgiveness nor is the issue that the giver of
forgiveness doesn’t keep his promises. No, here the issue is that we don’t take
the Lord fully at His word. The solution is to keep on attending to His word,
especially in the holy assembly of His people and to hear over and over again
His assurances that He meant what He said, that He has cast our sin so far away
that it’s not even a memory for Him. That’s a gift focused in the death of Jesus,
in whom our sins were swallowed up forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.