2 Kings
3:27 is a tough verse. The way the NIV
translates it, it seems to be a non
sequitur, a thing that doesn’t follow from what went before. NIV’s translation seems to say that the
defeated king of Moab took his son and sacrificed him. But how would that incite great fury against
Israel?
Possibilities
include the following. First, the king
of Moab’s action could have galvanized his people for one final push against
the Israelites, driving them out. I
think this is what the NIV translators are suggesting. In that case, the lesson would be something
about how Israel had the Lord’s explicit promise that Moab would be conquered
yet failed to hold what the Lord had given.
That certainly fits with Israel’s history.
Another
possibility might be that the defeated king of Moab captured the son of the
king of Edom in his last furious assault against Edom. Then, the king of Moab executed the son of
Edom, causing Edom to be angry with Israel and to withdraw from the alliance.
There are
other variations on the theme, but the upshot of them all seems to be the
same: Israel withdrew. They managed to snatch defeat from the jaws
of victory. That’s a remarkably human
story. Perfection, dedication,
follow-through—those are all things our race consistently fails at. So, a reminder of the Gospel: Jesus follows through—He went through the
death and the grave on to victory. And a
reminder that when life counterpunches and we’re ready to retreat, we are
called to stand our ground (Ephesians
6:13).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.