As I’ve
noted, Ahab wasn’t a pure idolater. He
was a syncretist, trying to hold
together aspects of Israel’s faith with aspects of Canaanite religion. So, we discover that his son is named
Ahaziah. (Though the Bible doesn’t point
this out, Ahaziah means something along the lines of “Yahweh stands firm;” it’s
a thoroughly Israelite name.) And in the
previous chapter, Ahab was in productive conversation with Yahweh’s
prophets. Further, we find Ahab humbling
himself before the Lord (v. 20). As a
matter of fact, Ahab doesn’t like it, but he understands why Naboth won’t sell
his vineyard. Ahab has read Leviticus
and Deuteronomy, or at least he remembers that “Israelites [are] God’s tenants in
the land of Canaan [and] do not have the right to alienate the land through its
permanent and irretrievable sale to a purchaser.”
Jezebel is
a pure idolater, and she has a fundamentally different idea about land. Her idea is that if you have enough power and
influence you can get anything you want—even if it means framing an innocent
man and orchestrating his death. Notice that
Jezebel waters reality down and makes no reference to how she arranged Naboth’s
death to her husband. Notice, too, that
Ahab doesn’t ask. Sometimes it’s just
safer not to know.
Notice,
too, the similarity with the story of David and Bathsheba: treacherously taking
a poor man’s one beloved thing by orchestrating his death, a prophet’s
confrontation, a kingdom in chaos, punishment falling on a son. At his worst, Israel’s best king, David, was
just as bad as her worst king, Ahab. Let
that be a reminder that sin lurks at the door of our heart to and that even the
best of Christians can fall into the deepest sin. Of course, David’s story is mitigated by the
Lord’s promise that his throne will endure, a promise that Ahab does not
have. Let that be a reminder to cling to
God’s promises of forgiveness and His faithfulness to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.