2 Chronicles 3-5
The Chronicler
portrays the temple as a long-anticipated building. He references David’s
(mis)adventures in bringing the ark to Jerusalem, noting that the temple site
was threshing floor of Araunah, where the plague had stopped (2 Samuel 24; 1
Chronicles 21). But he also references Mt. Moriah, “where the Lord had appeared
to his father David.” That incident is no where mentioned in the Bible. The only
other Biblical mention of Moriah is in Genesis 22, where it is the site of the
near-sacrifice of Isaac. The irony there is thick: the site of Isaac’s, the
requested, but not desired, sacrifice becomes the site on which Israel will
make sacrifice henceforth.
All the way
back in Deuteronomy 12, Moses had talked about the place where the Lord would
put His place to dwell. As the 40-year wilderness wandering came to an end,
Israel looked for a more permanent home, and Moses anticipated a more permanent
dwelling for the Lord on earth.
Several
ideas swirl. First, in yesterday’s and in tomorrow’s readings, Solomon himself understands
that the Lord’s permanent dwelling is the heavens. No earthly temple can
contain Him; He condescends to dwell among His people. No matter how ‘permanent’
the temple may seem over against the tabernacle, it’s still not the Lord’s
permanent home. Further, the Lord’s plan for us is that we will dwell in His
presence, so the vision of Revelation 21-22 is of a new heavens and a new
earth, a situation that hasn’t happened since Genesis 3, in which the dwellings
of God and of humans completely and totally overlap and we dwell in His
presence forever. Of this, Hebrews 12 gives a hint when it speaks of a kingdom
that cannot be shaken, a permantent home, so to speak.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.