In
some ways, chapter 22 is just more of the same: Jesus is in controversy with
the religious leaders of Israel; He speaks judgment against Israel, and He
asserts the priority of the reign of God. That narrative framework is familiar
from the rest of the Gospel. There are, however, two particular topics I think
warrant comment. First, there is the issue of one’s relationship with the powers
of this word, and, second, there is the question of marriage in God’s new age.
The
incident around the temple tax is a trap for Jesus. If He affirms paying Caesar’s
tax, He looks like a collaborator with a hated enemy. If He says not to pay the
tax, His opponents have occasion to charge Him as a revolutionary before
Pilate, the Roman governor. (They may not like Pilate, but they will use him
when he suits their purposes.) Jesus neatly sidesteps the trap with His aphorism,
“Render to Caesar’s what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” Caesar (and his
coins and taxes) belong to the order of the fallen age; insofar as we live in
that age, we obey it. However, we also live in God’s new age and our ultimate
loyalty belongs to that age.
I
don’t know if I have space here to lay all this out. American Christians seem
to struggle with this. Many of us are deeply suspicious of our government, but
we deeply love our country., and both are, in their own ways, problematic. As far
as the government is concerned, I refer you to Romans 13, where Paul asserts
that everyone in authority is there because God has placed him there. So, the
Christian is called to obedience to the government, except when the government
would order us to do something contrary to God’s will (compare Acts 5:29). As
far as loving our nation, we face questions of syncretism and of allegiance. Syncretism
is when you try to merge two different things and worship them together as if they
were the same thing. And indeed, since the founding, Americans have often
conflated their nation and their faith. (The Puritan settlers in New England
were the most obvious offenders with their talk that their new colony was “the
city set on a hill.”) Syncretism is an attempt to be equally loyal to two
different things, to have the best of two worlds. And throughout the Gospel,
Jesus has been clear—primary allegiance belongs to God and to God alone.
These
are difficult questions, and they’re not as simple as yes and no. They are
about living with the appropriate balance. I’d be happy to speak to this in our
Wednesday Bible study on April 22. Bring it up then, if you’d like to pursue it
further.
The
second topic is marriage. Here again, Jesus’ enemies are trying to trap Him,
and He neatly avoids the trap. But His answer gives us pause, “At the
resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be
like the angels in heaven.” We live in an era of family values. For many of us,
nothing is more important than family, whether our children or our spouses. And
this is just the latest in a series of sayings in which Jesus is almost
dismissive of family.
I’ve
been studying the Biblical teaching on marriage for two decades; I even wrote a
chapter for a book (never published) on the topic. Here’s a summary of that
study: marriage is a penultimate estate. This statement is plain even in our
wedding vows, where we declare our faithfulness “until death parts us.”
Marriage lasts until death, not beyond. In the resurrection.
Consider
this: if my spouse is a believer (and for the record, mine is…), then we relate
to each other in at least two ways: first, we are husband and wife, but we are also
brother and sister in Christ. When one of us passes, we will cease to be
husband and wife; what will remain into eternity is our relationship as brother
and sister in Christ. This, too, is a difficult topic and one that I am happy
to address at our midweek chat next week.
To briefly
summarize: Christ’s people are to keep their priorities straight. As Jesus says
in Matthew 6:33 (incidentally, my confirmation verse): “Seek first God’s kingdom
and His righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.” It is
good to rejoice in God’s good gifts of country and family, but let us never
fall into the trap of making them the highest value, a position that belongs to
the Giver of all good gifts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.